So I'm approached with a sarcastic reply to the last essay: "We'd love to hear your solution," or something to that effect. Perhaps I need to clarify a few things.
The solution, if it must be spelled out, is actually very simple: DO SOMETHING. What you're doing now--Nothing-- isn't working. Stop doing Nothing. Do Something. When you do Nothing, you allow stuff to happen like the re-election of inept presidents and the systematic pillage of the country's economy. So stop it.
"So what's Something?"
I'll tell you what's Something: anything that's right. Doing Nothing is wrong. I'll repeat that: doing Nothing is wrong. You can't say, "Nothing is Something, so when I'm doing Nothing, that's Something." No, it's not, because Nothing is wrong. Your Something has to be right. How do you determine what's right? If you can't figure that part out, then just do it. Then you'll either figure it out by the results or someone will figure it out for you.
And that's the second part: Pay Attention. Don't justify anything. Don't ever say, "Well, this is actually working because blah blah blah." That's justifying; that's wrong. That's what screws up global economies. Paying Attention actually tells you whether or not Something works. And if it's not working, try Something Else.
"I'm still not following; I want you to be more specific."
Fine, here are some examples. If your politician is doing a bad job--and most of them are--then write letters, arrange protests, get some petitions going (it's the oft-forgotten First Amendment freedom); we're supposed to be living in a government that gives the people the final say, so have your final say. If you worry about crime in your neighborhood, then start up something to give the locals some skills to get them real jobs; the big secret we're not telling our criminals is that if they have legitimate sources of income they'll be less likely to commit crimes. If you think a business is overstepping its boundaries, then call the shareholders, arrange boycotts. Start caring about something other than your favorite TV shows; trust me, they'll be out on video a couple of weeks after the season is over, so you'll have time to watch them after you've started fixing things.
So, let's summarize:
Step One: DO SOMETHING; anything that's right. Doing Nothing is wrong.
Step Two: PAY ATTENTION to what happens afterward; don't pretend what you're doing is working.
Monday, September 21, 2009
Saturday, September 12, 2009
5. On Terror
Hey, remember that time God flooded the earth to kill off all the sinners? Remember how well that turned out, eliminating sin and all that? Yeah, it's a similar intro than the last one, but it's a similar topic: terrorism (and, no, I didn't plan specifically to do this one at this time; there's a flow to all these posts, if you haven't yet seen it, and it has nothing to do with when they show up).
I'll try to keep this one short, because it has the same basic premise as the last post: you will not--will not--will not stop terrorism by "hunting down" all the world's terrorists. It simply will not happen. You can believe me now, or go ahead and try it, fail, and believe me later (although you won't admit to it, because this is a very emotionally charged issue, and nobody wants to admit to being wrong about it).
There are too many people who are out there who aren't terrorists but who are all too willing to believe the terrorists' ideals, and who are just a few steps away from becoming terrorists. There are too many people being born into terrorist families, being groomed in terrorist ways while they're still too young to think for themselves. You'll never kill them all. Never.
Just like God didn't stop sin by killing off all the world's sinners in the Great Flood.
Yes, I know that it's just a story and it didn't really happen, but I'm using it as a metaphor. Plus, some people do believe it, word-for-word, and my point will still stand: terrorism exists as an outlet for some people's fear and tendency towards violence. These, like the various tendencies towards sin and any proclivity towards doing "bad things," will not be purged from our species simply by killing the people that act on them it. Other people will lash out based on their fears, if not right away then later (and, obviously, unexpectedly). The only way to kill off the human race's problems is to kill off the human race.
So what's the real solution? That's a tough call, because, frankly, my solution to crime is a little too far-fetched. It involves people--probably you--caring about stuff that may never affect them. It involves people--definitely you--caring about other people they may never meet. It involves people--seriously, you--caring about anything at all. That's a lot to ask. So if we can't stop our own people from doing bad stuff to each other, how can we stop people from other countries doing bad stuff to our people? I'm not going to spell it out, because it involves a fundamental change in the way we--that is, you--see the world, other people, and ourselves. And if you're too lazy and stupid to figure out how to stop domestic crime, how can you expect to stop international crime?
For now, just know that nothing's going away until you get off your ass and do something.
I'll try to keep this one short, because it has the same basic premise as the last post: you will not--will not--will not stop terrorism by "hunting down" all the world's terrorists. It simply will not happen. You can believe me now, or go ahead and try it, fail, and believe me later (although you won't admit to it, because this is a very emotionally charged issue, and nobody wants to admit to being wrong about it).
There are too many people who are out there who aren't terrorists but who are all too willing to believe the terrorists' ideals, and who are just a few steps away from becoming terrorists. There are too many people being born into terrorist families, being groomed in terrorist ways while they're still too young to think for themselves. You'll never kill them all. Never.
Just like God didn't stop sin by killing off all the world's sinners in the Great Flood.
Yes, I know that it's just a story and it didn't really happen, but I'm using it as a metaphor. Plus, some people do believe it, word-for-word, and my point will still stand: terrorism exists as an outlet for some people's fear and tendency towards violence. These, like the various tendencies towards sin and any proclivity towards doing "bad things," will not be purged from our species simply by killing the people that act on them it. Other people will lash out based on their fears, if not right away then later (and, obviously, unexpectedly). The only way to kill off the human race's problems is to kill off the human race.
So what's the real solution? That's a tough call, because, frankly, my solution to crime is a little too far-fetched. It involves people--probably you--caring about stuff that may never affect them. It involves people--definitely you--caring about other people they may never meet. It involves people--seriously, you--caring about anything at all. That's a lot to ask. So if we can't stop our own people from doing bad stuff to each other, how can we stop people from other countries doing bad stuff to our people? I'm not going to spell it out, because it involves a fundamental change in the way we--that is, you--see the world, other people, and ourselves. And if you're too lazy and stupid to figure out how to stop domestic crime, how can you expect to stop international crime?
For now, just know that nothing's going away until you get off your ass and do something.
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
4. On Crime
Hey, remember how God made laws telling us not to do stuff like kill other people or steal things? Remember how nobody killed anyone or stole stuff after that?
No? Good, because it never happened.
Except the law part, that is (well, maybe; we at least know that somebody, somewhere, at some point, said "stop killing," etc.). What never happened was the cessation of murder and theft and all the other stuff people like to call "sins." What follows is not a criticism of religion (that's for later, and trust me, you won't like it), but a criticism of the nature of law versus crime.
You've probably figured out that I'm advocating the idea that outlawing something won't stop it from happening/existing. The Decalogue has been around for a few millenia, and probably wasn't the first of its kind; I don't know ancient history that well. But that doesn't matter. We have current laws that not only prohibit all kinds of stuff, but also spell out what the punishment will probably be for breaking the law. However, we find ourselves frustrated that crime still occurs; we seem to think that making the punishments worse--or going after the perpetrators more doggedly--will make the crime problem go away. We're collectively missing something.
And here it is: you won't stop crime as long as people have reasons to commit crimes. You know, on a subconscious level if nothing else, that you're a slave to your own desires. "I don't feel like cooking tonight, so I'll buy fast food." "I don't feel like exercising, so I'll just watch TV." Well, when people are caught in situations like poverty or addictions, they're slaves moreso to these needs. While most people's wants revolve around not doing things, some people's needs push them to do whatever it takes to help themselves, hence the stealing and other crimes. See, most criminals know that their crimes are wrong; it's just that they don't care, because another need supercedes the desire not to be caught and punished. Telling them not to do something (i.e. making a law against it) won't stop them from doing it.
Now here's the tricky part: the people that make the laws know all this stuff, and they either don't care or they use it to their advantage. Case in point: theft. Reducing poverty would reduce theft; with fewer people needing money/food, there'll be fewer people stealing things to pay for stuff. However, these people tend not to vote, so politicians don't care about what they need. (Funny, though: they often steal from people who do vote. Hmmmm...).
Another case in point: abortion. Now I'm not saying that it's a crime by nature, but I will say that I wish it didn't exist. The problem is that it's not going to go away if a law is made against it. The powers that be want you to think that it will, but these are the usually the same people that say, "If you outlaw guns, that won't stop gun violence." And they're right about the latter; what they won't admit is that the same logic applies to the former. If we actually eliminate the reasone why people consider abortion (inability to provide for a baby, unwanted pregnancies due to poor sex education, etc.), and thereby eliminate abortion, it no longer exists as a topic of political debate, and politicians risk losing important votes from people who would otherwise realize that they're little more than power-hungry plutocrats.
This is essentially why we lost the War on Drugs, by the way. People told us, "We're going to go find all the drug dealers and arrest them, and that will eliminate the problem of illegal drugs." We believed that. Well, it didn't work because there were--and are--still reasons for people to want illegal drugs, so there's still a market for illegal drugs, and therefore still illegal drug dealers. The War on Drugs was fought on the wrong front from the start, but those in power do like the fact that drugs still exist as a possible political platform if they ever want to come up with another pretend solution.
The actual solution to all this stuff goes back to a previous post of mine that states that you need to demand more from your so-called leaders, and hold them to their promises more strictly than you have in the past. Until you do that, don't expect them to solve anything for you. And don't expect not to have to worry about crime.
... Now, can you guess what I'd say concerning the problem of terrorism?
No? Good, because it never happened.
Except the law part, that is (well, maybe; we at least know that somebody, somewhere, at some point, said "stop killing," etc.). What never happened was the cessation of murder and theft and all the other stuff people like to call "sins." What follows is not a criticism of religion (that's for later, and trust me, you won't like it), but a criticism of the nature of law versus crime.
You've probably figured out that I'm advocating the idea that outlawing something won't stop it from happening/existing. The Decalogue has been around for a few millenia, and probably wasn't the first of its kind; I don't know ancient history that well. But that doesn't matter. We have current laws that not only prohibit all kinds of stuff, but also spell out what the punishment will probably be for breaking the law. However, we find ourselves frustrated that crime still occurs; we seem to think that making the punishments worse--or going after the perpetrators more doggedly--will make the crime problem go away. We're collectively missing something.
And here it is: you won't stop crime as long as people have reasons to commit crimes. You know, on a subconscious level if nothing else, that you're a slave to your own desires. "I don't feel like cooking tonight, so I'll buy fast food." "I don't feel like exercising, so I'll just watch TV." Well, when people are caught in situations like poverty or addictions, they're slaves moreso to these needs. While most people's wants revolve around not doing things, some people's needs push them to do whatever it takes to help themselves, hence the stealing and other crimes. See, most criminals know that their crimes are wrong; it's just that they don't care, because another need supercedes the desire not to be caught and punished. Telling them not to do something (i.e. making a law against it) won't stop them from doing it.
Now here's the tricky part: the people that make the laws know all this stuff, and they either don't care or they use it to their advantage. Case in point: theft. Reducing poverty would reduce theft; with fewer people needing money/food, there'll be fewer people stealing things to pay for stuff. However, these people tend not to vote, so politicians don't care about what they need. (Funny, though: they often steal from people who do vote. Hmmmm...).
Another case in point: abortion. Now I'm not saying that it's a crime by nature, but I will say that I wish it didn't exist. The problem is that it's not going to go away if a law is made against it. The powers that be want you to think that it will, but these are the usually the same people that say, "If you outlaw guns, that won't stop gun violence." And they're right about the latter; what they won't admit is that the same logic applies to the former. If we actually eliminate the reasone why people consider abortion (inability to provide for a baby, unwanted pregnancies due to poor sex education, etc.), and thereby eliminate abortion, it no longer exists as a topic of political debate, and politicians risk losing important votes from people who would otherwise realize that they're little more than power-hungry plutocrats.
This is essentially why we lost the War on Drugs, by the way. People told us, "We're going to go find all the drug dealers and arrest them, and that will eliminate the problem of illegal drugs." We believed that. Well, it didn't work because there were--and are--still reasons for people to want illegal drugs, so there's still a market for illegal drugs, and therefore still illegal drug dealers. The War on Drugs was fought on the wrong front from the start, but those in power do like the fact that drugs still exist as a possible political platform if they ever want to come up with another pretend solution.
The actual solution to all this stuff goes back to a previous post of mine that states that you need to demand more from your so-called leaders, and hold them to their promises more strictly than you have in the past. Until you do that, don't expect them to solve anything for you. And don't expect not to have to worry about crime.
... Now, can you guess what I'd say concerning the problem of terrorism?
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
3. ... Or Just Shut Up
I was reading a couple of articles about lying today. They claimed that the average adult lies between 200 and 300 times per day, or roughly three times every ten minutes (this includes so-called "white lies"). Also, most people apparently assume they've been lied to a lot, and think that most of their own lies are acceptable.
I'll keep this one short: a lie shows not only a certain amount of contempt for the listener (in that you don't respect him/her enough to tell the truth) and for yourself (in that you don't think people care enough to hear the truth from you). Deny it all you want, but there are varying degrees to which that's true for every person and every lie.
Doesn't matter if you want to preserve someone's feelings; the more we lie, the more apathetic we become about lying, and the more it happens without the appropriate retribution. (You'll notice that this ties into my previous post; that's why I chose it as a topic).
So, obviously, you'll want to be careful about what you hear, and don't be afraid to call someone on his/her lie(s). But, more importantly-- much more importantly-- start demanding better of yourself. Don't be afraid to tell the truth; bravery seems to be such an important aspect of adulthood, and yet we're all so afraid of telling people what we really think. When you're uncompromisingly honest with others, they'll soon be uncompromisingly honest with you, and then with each other.
Let's start some good trends for a change; we owe the world something for invoking over ten seasons of Big Brother upon it.
I'll keep this one short: a lie shows not only a certain amount of contempt for the listener (in that you don't respect him/her enough to tell the truth) and for yourself (in that you don't think people care enough to hear the truth from you). Deny it all you want, but there are varying degrees to which that's true for every person and every lie.
Doesn't matter if you want to preserve someone's feelings; the more we lie, the more apathetic we become about lying, and the more it happens without the appropriate retribution. (You'll notice that this ties into my previous post; that's why I chose it as a topic).
So, obviously, you'll want to be careful about what you hear, and don't be afraid to call someone on his/her lie(s). But, more importantly-- much more importantly-- start demanding better of yourself. Don't be afraid to tell the truth; bravery seems to be such an important aspect of adulthood, and yet we're all so afraid of telling people what we really think. When you're uncompromisingly honest with others, they'll soon be uncompromisingly honest with you, and then with each other.
Let's start some good trends for a change; we owe the world something for invoking over ten seasons of Big Brother upon it.
Monday, August 17, 2009
2. Demand Better
Came across this link a couple days ago:
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/taliban/funding-the-taliban
What the article basically says, for those of you who didn't feel like reading it, is that a lot of the money that funds the Taliban is coming from the same NGOs that are trying to rebuild Afghanistan. Their money comes from the government, who, as you know, gets their money from... well, you.
So here's the deal: you don't demand enough from your elected officials. They make promises, you vote them into positions of power (i.e. positions that give them control over the spenditure of your money), they break their promises, and you... complain about it. That's not good enough. You deserve better from them, but you're too stupid to go after it.
Complaints don't work; opinion polls don't change anything. Case in point: before the 2004 election, the national news kept showing polls stating that a large number of Americans would vote for George Bush, but would want him to do things differently in his second term. Bush, for his part, ran campaign ads stating that he would do things the same way as he did in his first term. People voted him in anyway. He did things the same way he had done them the first time. The public's opinion of his work dropped. Nothing changed; he kept doing things the way he had done them the first time. Do you see where the incongruity is?
Politicians don't actually care about what people think of them. You have to be that way in order to succeed in politics, because your opponents will say anything about you to make people not want to vote for you. Whether it's your city councilperson or the President, they have a singular goal; receiving your vote. So, rather than actually care about what you think, they spend vast amounts of time, money, and energy making it look like they care about what you think. Now, most of you are too jaded to actually believe that they care, but you're also too lazy to go through the effort of demanding better out of them, or demanding fundamental changes in the system. So you vote in the same kinds of people, and they do the same kind of work, and you get more and more jaded, and at that point hearing news stories about how your money is funding the same people that are shooting at your country's soldiers makes no difference to you. You're too numb.
So think about this for a second: there are two groups of people that are paying the price for your apathy in this situation. The first group is the military, that is, the actual soldiers on the field; I don't think I need to explain that any further. The second group is the rest of the people that the Taliban is killing or otherwise hurting, oppressing, etc.: the locals. They didn't ask for that kind of life; they didn't ask to be born where they are, just like you didn't ask to be born American (or wherever you are that you have access to some guy's blog).
So what's the fix? How do we demand better from our government? How do you make sure that your laziness doesn't beget the laziness of the people that are supposed to protect us, thus letting your money slip into the hands of people that are supposed to be our enemies? Simple: stop voting for the same people.
Sure, there's nothing inherently wrong with writing letters to your elected officials; the oft-forgotten First Amendment right is the right to petition the government to redress grievances (i.e. fix the stuff they did wrong). Unfortunately, not enough people want to expend that kind of energy, and I'm afraid that if I simply tell you to get off your ass and do the work yourself, you'll stop reading. But voting is easy. You spend too much time watching TV in the first place, so you see your share of political ads. Listen to what the politicians say about themselves and not what they say about each other. Vote for the one that promises what you want, and if s/he doesn't deliver-- this is apparently the tough part-- VOTE FOR SOMEONE ELSE. One lie is all it takes. Vote for someone else.
You deserve better than being lied to by someone who doesn't care about what you think. You deserve better than having people take your money, spend it in another country, and not think that you'll care if they let some of it go to terrorists. Just stop being too dumb to demand it.
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/taliban/funding-the-taliban
What the article basically says, for those of you who didn't feel like reading it, is that a lot of the money that funds the Taliban is coming from the same NGOs that are trying to rebuild Afghanistan. Their money comes from the government, who, as you know, gets their money from... well, you.
So here's the deal: you don't demand enough from your elected officials. They make promises, you vote them into positions of power (i.e. positions that give them control over the spenditure of your money), they break their promises, and you... complain about it. That's not good enough. You deserve better from them, but you're too stupid to go after it.
Complaints don't work; opinion polls don't change anything. Case in point: before the 2004 election, the national news kept showing polls stating that a large number of Americans would vote for George Bush, but would want him to do things differently in his second term. Bush, for his part, ran campaign ads stating that he would do things the same way as he did in his first term. People voted him in anyway. He did things the same way he had done them the first time. The public's opinion of his work dropped. Nothing changed; he kept doing things the way he had done them the first time. Do you see where the incongruity is?
Politicians don't actually care about what people think of them. You have to be that way in order to succeed in politics, because your opponents will say anything about you to make people not want to vote for you. Whether it's your city councilperson or the President, they have a singular goal; receiving your vote. So, rather than actually care about what you think, they spend vast amounts of time, money, and energy making it look like they care about what you think. Now, most of you are too jaded to actually believe that they care, but you're also too lazy to go through the effort of demanding better out of them, or demanding fundamental changes in the system. So you vote in the same kinds of people, and they do the same kind of work, and you get more and more jaded, and at that point hearing news stories about how your money is funding the same people that are shooting at your country's soldiers makes no difference to you. You're too numb.
So think about this for a second: there are two groups of people that are paying the price for your apathy in this situation. The first group is the military, that is, the actual soldiers on the field; I don't think I need to explain that any further. The second group is the rest of the people that the Taliban is killing or otherwise hurting, oppressing, etc.: the locals. They didn't ask for that kind of life; they didn't ask to be born where they are, just like you didn't ask to be born American (or wherever you are that you have access to some guy's blog).
So what's the fix? How do we demand better from our government? How do you make sure that your laziness doesn't beget the laziness of the people that are supposed to protect us, thus letting your money slip into the hands of people that are supposed to be our enemies? Simple: stop voting for the same people.
Sure, there's nothing inherently wrong with writing letters to your elected officials; the oft-forgotten First Amendment right is the right to petition the government to redress grievances (i.e. fix the stuff they did wrong). Unfortunately, not enough people want to expend that kind of energy, and I'm afraid that if I simply tell you to get off your ass and do the work yourself, you'll stop reading. But voting is easy. You spend too much time watching TV in the first place, so you see your share of political ads. Listen to what the politicians say about themselves and not what they say about each other. Vote for the one that promises what you want, and if s/he doesn't deliver-- this is apparently the tough part-- VOTE FOR SOMEONE ELSE. One lie is all it takes. Vote for someone else.
You deserve better than being lied to by someone who doesn't care about what you think. You deserve better than having people take your money, spend it in another country, and not think that you'll care if they let some of it go to terrorists. Just stop being too dumb to demand it.
Friday, August 14, 2009
1. Inaguriffic!
So, here we go; first blog post. First step into the vast, seemingly endless field that is the weblog community. One push further into the Information Age; one more foot in Cyberspace. Off I go into the wild "blog" yonder... AAH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HAAA! Oh, man... A-HA HA HA HA HAAA! My sides... oh, geez... classic... ah-hem... whoo... heh heh heh...
Anyway, here's a little bit about me and why I'm here: I'm a college graduate with a degree in telecommunication (i.e. TV) who decided that not only do I hate working in television, but that it was also killing me. I have since tried a few other routes, but nothing has worked out better so far. Which brings me here, sitting in front of a computer, awaiting the birth of my first child (not today; in a couple of months), and realizing that one of my life's goals has been to make a statement. Some kind of statement, somehow, somewhere.
Now I'm not dumb; I realize that the chances are small that this blog will somehow rise out of the expanses of the entire realm of Blogdom and become a global phenomenon, and I can live with that. For now I'm considering it a start.
So, why are you here? Well, odds are you either know me personally, or from somewhere else on the Internet (*cough* http://www.squidninja.com/ *cough* http://glarryg.deviantart.com/ *cough*), or perhaps someone else who does know me gave you a link. It doesn't matter. But I hope you stay because I plan to challenge you and a lot of what you probably take for granted: beliefs, ideals, and whatnot. That's the challenge I'm giving myself, because I firmly believe that we-- humanity-- deserve better than what we've made for ourselves. The problem is that, collectively, we're too stupid to go after it.
--Glarryg
Anyway, here's a little bit about me and why I'm here: I'm a college graduate with a degree in telecommunication (i.e. TV) who decided that not only do I hate working in television, but that it was also killing me. I have since tried a few other routes, but nothing has worked out better so far. Which brings me here, sitting in front of a computer, awaiting the birth of my first child (not today; in a couple of months), and realizing that one of my life's goals has been to make a statement. Some kind of statement, somehow, somewhere.
Now I'm not dumb; I realize that the chances are small that this blog will somehow rise out of the expanses of the entire realm of Blogdom and become a global phenomenon, and I can live with that. For now I'm considering it a start.
So, why are you here? Well, odds are you either know me personally, or from somewhere else on the Internet (*cough* http://www.squidninja.com/ *cough* http://glarryg.deviantart.com/ *cough*), or perhaps someone else who does know me gave you a link. It doesn't matter. But I hope you stay because I plan to challenge you and a lot of what you probably take for granted: beliefs, ideals, and whatnot. That's the challenge I'm giving myself, because I firmly believe that we-- humanity-- deserve better than what we've made for ourselves. The problem is that, collectively, we're too stupid to go after it.
--Glarryg
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)